Game Value · player

Does it see more than plus‑minus?

Each participant rates every appearance in five leagues. The ratings freeze at the round’s deadline and are then asked to order football that had not been played yet — against the same question answered by each player’s own on-pitch goal difference. What is published is the increment, and a rating that quietly follows the scoreboard scores zero.

Player Value ranking

Did the goals follow your players?

Week ending 2026-W43, 2026/2027. Each match is cut into three segments, so a substitution compares the same side with and without a player against the same opponent on the same afternoon; what is published is the increment over each player’s own on-pitch goal difference. The second ranking is never blended with this one.

750segments scorable this week · the denominator
5leagues, one score across them
3segments per match, paired within a stratum
2participants published
RankParticipantSkill scoreSomers' DLineup-blind floorCoverageRight winner
1
FotMobEntered by the Arena · not submitted by the vendorScored under an exceptionWeeks and pair counts
+0.030−0.022 to +0.083Level with plus-minus
+0.232plus-minus +0.203
+0.138ranks nothing
69.9%524 of 750 segments · 94.9% rated
58.2%−5 vs plus-minus
2
WhoScoredEntered by the Arena · not submitted by the vendorScored under an exceptionWeeks and pair counts
+0.016−0.035 to +0.067Level with plus-minus
+0.220plus-minus +0.205
+0.141ranks nothing
73.1%548 of 750 segments · 95.7% rated
58.3%−2 vs plus-minus

The floor is the column to read first. It is what a signal knowing only each club’s record would score on the identical segments — no lineups, no ratings. In both complete rehearsal seasons it landed about 0.004 below plus-minus, which means a rating that merely knows which team is better has already been priced in, and only what sits clear of both is a claim about players.

2 published · 0 separated from plus-minus · week 2026-W43 · 2026-09-game-value-player-v0Skill score is the participant’s Somers’ D minus naive plus-minus’s on the identical segments, so zero means adding nothing to what each player’s own on-pitch goal difference already says. The interval is paired, and a row reads level with plus-minus whenever it contains zero — the expected first-season result. Coverage is segments scored over segments scorable, with the share of on-pitch players rated beneath it. Right winner ranks nothing: it is how often the signal pointed at the side that won a segment, and can be read segment by segment under Players. How it is computed.

How to read it

Level with plus-minus is the honest first-season result

A skill score is a difference between two concordance statistics measured on the same segments. Over three rehearsed seasons the two published rating products separated from each other by about 0.015 — while against plus-minus itself one was flat throughout and the other cleared zero in a single season. So most rows will carry an interval that contains zero, and the board says level with plus-minus in words rather than implying an ordering its own numbers refuse. A row that stays a little clear of the baseline for two seasons has shown something a row sitting at +0.05 for one week has not.

The two rankings are not a first and second opinion. One asks whether the goals followed the players a rating liked; the other asks whether the coach did. A product can be strong on either without being strong on the other, and that is a finding rather than a contradiction. There is no combined figure on this page because the Arena has no defensible weighting between them — inventing one would make up the most important number here.

The selection column also resolves several times coarser than the score, so it separates two products far more rarely. Read the board column by column, or the protocol for the segments, the deadlines, the stratification and how each interval is resampled.